To understand the problem of natural right, one must start, not from the "scientific" understanding of political things but from their "natural" understanding, i.e., from the way in which they present themselves in political life, in action, when they are our business, when we have to make decisions. This does not mean that political life necessarily knows of natural right. Natural right had to be discovered, and there was political life prior to that discovery. It means merely that political life in all its forms necessarily points toward natural right as an inevitable problem. Awareness of this problem is not older than political science but coeval with it. Hence a political life that does not know of the idea of natural is necessarily unaware of the possibility of political science and, indeed, of the possibility of science as such, just as a political life that is aware of the the possibility of sicence necessarily knows natural right as a problem.

Leo Strauss, Natural Right and History

Syndicate

Syndicate content

User login

Navigation

Blogs

Pop music summary

Hard to top this.

-dx

Prop 8: The Musical

So this is apparently making the rounds of the blogosphere:



See more Jack Black videos at Funny or Die

and as you can imagine, the wingnuts are not happy. I've always thought that there's something particularly devastating about humour as a weapon, and this video demonstrates the point.

-dx

In Austin, we called these guys "trustafarians"


What kind of blog I am.

Typealyzer claims to be able to tell what kind of blog any site is. Having plugged in my site, here's what I got:

The logical and analytical type. They are especialy attuned to difficult creative and intellectual challenges and always look for something more complex to dig into. They are great at finding subtle connections between things and imagine far-reaching implications.

They enjoy working with complex things using a lot of concepts and imaginative models of reality. Since they are not very good at seeing and understanding the needs of other people, they might come across as arrogant, impatient and insensitive to people that need some time to understand what they are talking about.

Go figure.

-dx

Shorter Kathleen Parker

Shorter Kathleen Parker: Segregation was bad because Southern white people who were rich enough to have hired black servants would had to hire an additional white servant, as black servants couldn't go everywhere

-dx

Former Reagan Chief of Staff endorses Obama

Well, this was unpredicted, but unsurprising. Ken Duberstein endorses Barack Obama for President over John McCain. This has got to be painful for McCain's team, as the only thing holding their coalition together is their mutual fondness for Ronald Reagan.


This, of course, was following Lawrence Eagleburger admitting that she's just not able to do the job:

"I don't think at the moment she is prepared to take over the reigns of the presidency,'' he said. "I can name for you any number of other vice presidents who were not particularly up to it either. So the question, I think, is can she learn and would she be tough enough under the circumstances if she were asked to become president, heaven forbid that that ever takes place?

What is fascinating to me about these last few years has been watching the the Republican coalition fall apart. The Yankee Republican is all but dead. The Western Republican is almost entirely gone. Basically, all that's left of their once grand coalition is the religious right types and plutocrats - and they're just not enough to win elections.

-dx

You really like me! You really, really like me!

H/T to canuckster.

This is just so pathetic.

-dx

Liveblogging the VP debate

HAH!

The Columbia Journalism Review has finally decided to push back against the McCain campaign's attacks on the media. Brilliant.

-dx

Fox News strikes agains


When presented with Fox, sometimes there's nothing you can say. Just watch.

-dx