To understand the problem of natural right, one must start, not from the "scientific" understanding of political things but from their "natural" understanding, i.e., from the way in which they present themselves in political life, in action, when they are our business, when we have to make decisions. This does not mean that political life necessarily knows of natural right. Natural right had to be discovered, and there was political life prior to that discovery. It means merely that political life in all its forms necessarily points toward natural right as an inevitable problem. Awareness of this problem is not older than political science but coeval with it. Hence a political life that does not know of the idea of natural is necessarily unaware of the possibility of political science and, indeed, of the possibility of science as such, just as a political life that is aware of the the possibility of sicence necessarily knows natural right as a problem.

Leo Strauss, Natural Right and History

Syndicate

Syndicate content

User login

Navigation

Where have I been?

Those of you who actually still read my site from time to time will notice that till yesterday, I hadn't updated it since May, and prior to that, in months. Basically, I've just been working a lot, and I feel really uncomfortable blogging during the hours when someone is paying for my time. Yeah, I know that there are moments in the day when people read blogs or just chill out, but while I can't really articulate the difference, I think that it's one thing to go to Amazon and check on your order and something else entirely to organise your thoughts, write them out and then edit them on a blog.

So, anyway, I'm going to try to be more active on here and on my other writing commitments, but let's see how well I manage to hold to that.

-dx